Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Q. When is a Main Character Not a Main Character?


A. When the creators are nervous about working with icons.

Of course, who am I to talk? No one has ever plopped a legendary character in my lap and said, "go for it." From a young age, however, I have been crafting my own stories with characters that hold iconic status the world over. Whether it was with action figures in hand, on my mother's old typewriter, or in script programs on a Macbook, I have always tried to understand the unique nature of characters that pass from creator to creator. As I've studied this in practice, a certain "tell" has become noticeable. Many creators, even big, bankable names, have been known to take on classic characters in eponymous books and tell stories that focus on anything but the classic character.

A good perennial example of this is the Vertigo title Hellblazer. The long-running book was first written by Jamie Delano and is now a consistent low-seller, but the book hasn't neared cancellation because it's a good venue to test out new writers at such a small imprint. While the main character may be John Constantine (no resemblance to the awful movie iteration), he is often little more than a lens into whatever fantastic situations or antagonists writers come up with. John Constantine, instead of being a long-established character, is really a cipher.

But enough of 'ole John. Denny Colt has his fair share of time out of the spotlight to deal with. Let us look at the sixth issue of Darwyn Cooke's run, in which the Spirit appears in only a few pages as he listens to the story that he largely missed. I enjoyed the issue, and I felt that the writing and the art were both strong, but there was nothing dictating that it be a Spirit story. Any detective or good-doer could have been substituted in with no ill effect.

Looking at Cooke's collaboration with Jeph Loeb, (in)famously hot and cold writer, we can see a similar, but not identical case unfolding. In this Eisner-award winning one-shot, which sparked enough interest to garner a Spirit ongoing written and drawn by Cooke, Loeb plays heavily on the similarities between the Batman and the Spirit to create a feasible (in comic book sense) reason for the characters to meet. As Batman and the Spirit both have close connections to police commissioners and colorful rogues galleries, the story centers around a grand team-up of the rogues to crash a police ball that brings the crime-busting forces of Gotham and Central City to one place. Though it is an oversized issue, Loeb spends the majority of the time fleshing out the characters of Commissioners Gordon and Dolan and planting the seeds of deception and seduction with Catwoman (a character that Cooke helped to redesign and reinvent) and P'gell (one of the many sultry women to cross the Spirit's path). Batman is nearly wordless throughout much of his appearance (as is completely in character) and the Spirit doesn't have much of a character at all, beyond being a bit less intelligent and a bit more eager than Bats. Cooke's art, complemented by the inkwork of J. Bone and the colors of Dave Stewart, harkens back to the period from which the Spirit emerged without being drenched in noir trappings. The story is fun and no gross mischaracterization is perpetuated, but at the end of the day, the titular characters are secondary to the supporting cast.

Loeb is always either a whiz at cutting right to the core of characters (see: Batman: The Long Halloween, Superman: For All Seasons, the "color" books) or a fiend for taking a massive dump on any previous characterization at the extreme disservice of the finished product (see: anything under the Ultimate banner, the first 12 or so issues of Hulk). Here he walks a fine line between servicing the legacy and actually adding to the mythos. Is that all we can hope for? Even Alan Moore and Neil Gaiman, when they tackled the character for a series published by Kitchen Sink Press entitled The Spirit: New Adventures, wrote the hell out of every character except for the damn Spirit! Moore's contribution, drawn by his Watchmen collaborator Dave Gibbons, retells the Spirit's origin -- by telling the origin of three ancillary characters involved. Gaiman's focuses on a sadsack writer who happens to accidentally help the Spirit out on a case. Both stories are beautifully written, feature wonderful art and some of the most inventive titles I have ever seen (Gibbons spells using breakfast items), but they were little more than love notes that were afraid to sully what came before by adding something readers might not agree with. While Will Eisner classically used the character as a vessel to tell stories about many colorful secondary characters with some very poignant notes, he did so without sacrificing actual characterization of the hero. The only other real attempt I have seen at deepening Denny is Frank Miller's movie, and nothing about that could be deemed a success (notice how I never say anything nice about comic book movies?).

As the Spirit prepares to be reintroduced by Brian Azzerello and Rags Morales in the pages of DC's New Wave, he'll also receive his own title written by Prince Valiant news strip scripter Mark Shultz. That (admittedly underwhelming) news, however, was dulled when Shultz spoke to Jeff Renaud at CBR and let it be known that he would depart the title after only three issues, citing too much on his plate. Is he also concerned about the weight of writing such a renowned character? Possibly not, as he made it known that the trademark humor of the series would take a backseat to darker tales featuring the character, a sign that comic fans have learned to fear. Then again, I have to wonder how many fans the Spirit even has. With half a century since his debut, long periods out of the limelight, whole generations of fans that know nothing about him, an awful movie adaptation, several false starts, and a seeming lack of characterization, what fan base is the Spirit holding onto, and how long will it last?

6 comments:

  1. I don't know if I would agree that The Spirit seemed like an absent character throughout. The story in my opinion said a lot about both characters not in how they acted individually but by how they interacted with each other. I don't think "screen time" (or panel time?) dictates how much we experience that character.
    But also I guess in a single issue I guess it can be hard to encompass two characters with as strong a history as these two and give them both the attention they deserve. But that's almost why I like it, cause it doesn't give you much. It's just a story of how they bumped in to each other. Hell, The Spirit doesn't even believe that Batman exists....kinda.

    As a caveat I did read the six previous issues that Cooke wrote himself before this which dives much more into The Spirit himself (and a few of the villains) than does this issue.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hm, well, I think there's something to be said for a writer trying to do a respectable job as opposed to running with it and destroying it in the process. Who are we to blame Cooke when Moore didn't even measure up?

    I doubt Azzerello is really the man for the job in any case. His character flairs don't really have any place in The Spirit in my mind, though I could see him writing some great noir villains.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Keep in mind, Dan, that the layout of the trade doesn't reflect the release schedule. The one-shot came out first and the ongoing spawned from that. Essentially, the Spirit's grand reintroduction to comics fans came from an issue where Batman's rogues and the police commissioners are the stars of the tale. It's a storytelling tactic, but I don't think it was effectively used here for what the story was supposed to be. Loeb has a tendency to sacrifice characterization of major characters to buff up villains, a la his current run on "Hulk" where Marvel heavyweights are being thrown around like tissue paper to make the Red Hulk look intimidating.

    And Moore's issue was wonderful, it just was about every character except the titular character. If this style of storytelling was used sparingly, the results would be different. My observation, however, is that the Spirit often suffers from this, leading to a lack of characterization. I won't be reading Azzerello's series anyway -- the idea of a dark, gun-toting Batman is enough to keep me far, far away.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ugh my computer died as I finished writing my comment... fail.
    Anyway, I see what you mean about the purported main characters not being focused on much, and as you mentioned a lot of what we learn about them comes from second hand sources: the villains and a little bit from the police commissioners. I didn't think this was necessarily bad though, it gives a different lens on their characters.
    I liked seeing the wide array of characters in the issue, but on the other hand I would have liked to see the Spirit and Batman interact a little more. Their costume swap and everything was pretty behind-the-scenes. Since I don't know a whole lot about the Spirit (or the comics industry...) and I also read the other six issues first, I can only imagine what my reaction would be if I'd read this at the time of release.
    On a different note, I'm glad you can share a perspective that takes into account the events/history/etc. surrounding (or paralleling I suppose) some of the comics we read. It definitely gives me something else to think about, although I get a little lost on some of the names/references. :P

    ReplyDelete
  5. Stephen,

    I liked your background information concerning how you "try to understand the unique nature of characters that pass from creator to creator and your insights on their authors' tell. How many focus on anything BUT the classic character." Very interesting observation.

    Enjoyed your example of HELLBLAZER. I have never read HELLBLAZER. From your perspective, did "any" of the authors, including Jmie Delano, write any stellar issues or stories?

    Appreciated your analysis the new SPIRIT story and of Cooke's, J. Bone's and Stewart's art and how it was interesting to see art without noir influences.

    You reminded me to read BATMAN: THE LONG HALLOWEEN.

    It is too bad that Azzerello and Morales are doing their own take on the SPIRIT. The Spirit deserves better treatment than these.

    ReplyDelete
  6. There are many excellent Hellblazer stories to be found, and I expect Delano's upcoming return to the property along with artist Jock will be an excellent story. How else do you add to a character created by Alan Moore than by going in a totally different direction?

    As for Azzerrello and Morales, I'm certainly not going to condemn their take on the character, it's just different. I'm not particularly drawn to the character unless the element of humor is present because I have read about enough dark vigilantes in my time. The preview pages have been absolutely gorgeous, certainly the career-best work from Morales and colorist Nei Ruffino. Shultz's comments certainly put me off the series, though the art is still gorgeous. The bottom line, as an avid reader and as a customer, is that I don't need to pay to read another book about dark, gun-toting Batmen and humorless crusaders, regardless of quality.

    ReplyDelete